Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Adams v. Jackson
as 2:2022cv00831
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Adams
Respondent:
Robert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv01089
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Brown and Robert Lee Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Doney v. Inslee et al
as 4:2020cv05156
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Doney
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Jefferey Uttecht and Jay Inslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv05486
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. City of Fircrest et al
as 3:2015cv05955
Plaintiff:
Stuart J Harris
Defendant:
City of Fircrest , Rick Rosenbladt , Lisa Keely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05198
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Peters
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Rainey
as 2:2014cv00887
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Robert Lee Rainey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
In re L&L Energy Inc Securities Litigation
as 2:2011cv01423
Plaintiff:
Jeff Mills and Gregg Irvin
Defendant:
L&L Energy Inc, Dickson V. Lee, Jung Mei Wang and others
In Re:
L&L Energy Inc Securities Litigation
Petitioner:
Mark Stites, L&L Energy Investor Group, Aleksandar Krstevski and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Rainey
as 2:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Robert Lee Rainey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Yates v. Sinclair
as 2:2013cv00842
Respondent:
Stephen D. Sinclair
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
