Cases 61 - 70 of 356
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2015cv00792
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dillard et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Arnetra Smith
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard, Donald Campbell, Bill Wynne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Spencer v. Robert Bentley, et al
as 15-10931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD SPENCER, on behalf of others similarly situated individuals
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BENTLEY, in his individual and official capacity, LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, in his individual and official capacity, CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, in his individual and official capacity and others
Dozier v. Armstrong et al (MAG+)
as 1:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mary L.R. Dozier
Defendant:
Lawton Armstrong, Robert Bentley, Butch Binford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Bentley et al
as 7:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Hasalee Mims
Defendant:
Robert Bentley and Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Price et al
as 2:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Walker , Sr
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bentley et al
as 2:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
Cedric Landon Jones
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Bentley et al
as 5:2015cv00056
Plaintiff:
Calvin W Scott
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , James Woodruff , Lucile B. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Emerson v. Aguilar et al
as 4:2015cv00004
Defendant:
Omar Aguilar and English Collision, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Bentley Emerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mele et al v. Lake et al
as 1:2014cv07425
Plaintiff:
Connie P. Mele, Michael Douglas, Yvonne Singleton and others
Defendant:
Marianne Lake, Robert Bentley, James Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
