Cases 1 - 10 of 24
DONNELL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15944
Plaintiff:
SUSAN DONNELL and ROBERT DONNELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19133
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DONNELL HARMAN, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ursery v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2021cv00554
Plaintiff:
Robert Donnell Ursery, III
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donnell v. Howard
as 1:2020cv01995
Respondent:
Catricia Howard
Petitioner:
Robert Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DONNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54889
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DONNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DONNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19509
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROBERT DONNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ClearChoice Management Services, LLC v. Donnell
as 1:2018cv02255
Defendant:
Robert Donnell
Plaintiff:
ClearChoice Management Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Parks, et al v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 17-13969
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DONNELL PARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN WARDEN
Williams v. Chapman et al
as 2:2017cv02458
Plaintiff:
Eric Deshon Williams
Defendant:
Arvil Chapman, Hensley, Walt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Denton County Jail et al
as 4:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robert Donnell Davis
Defendant:
Denton County Jail and Tracy Murphree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
