Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Lawrence Goodine v. City of Chattanooga, et al
as 10-6231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE F. GOODINE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, FREEMAN COOPER, Chief, BOBBY DODD and others
Robert Evans, et al v. Board of Education Southwester, et al
as 10-4011
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT EVANS, father and legal guardian of L.E., a minor and TONYA RIFFE, mother and legal guardian of B.R. a minor
Defendant - Appellant:
BOARD OF EDUCATION SOUTHWESTERN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and PAUL SMATHERS, Principal
Fields v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv01168
Plaintiff:
Nathson E. Fields
Defendant:
City of Chicago, County of Cook, Office of Cook County State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. City of Muscle Shoals, Alabama et al
as 3:2009cv01396
Plaintiff:
Stephen Alexander
Defendant:
City of Muscle Shoals, Alabama, Robert Evans, Eddie Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodine v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2009cv00050
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Freeman Cooper, Bobby Dodd and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence F Goodine
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe v. Wozniak et al
as 3:2008cv01951
Plaintiff:
A. Doe and A. Doe
Defendant:
Joseph Wozniak, Robert Evans and Luzerne County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Board of Education Southwestern City School et al
as 2:2008cv00794
Plaintiff:
Robert Evans, Robert Evans, Robert Evans and others
Defendant:
Board of Education Southwestern City School District, Paul Smathers and Joyce Malainy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arshad, et al v. Congemi, et al
as 08-30061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KALEEM ARSHAD, Dr., Individually and on behalf of decendent, Dr. Jameela Arshad and NADEEM S ARSHAD, Individually and on behalf of decendent, Dr. Jameela Arshad
Defendant - Appellee:
NICK CONGEMI, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Kenner, KENNER CITY, KENNER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
