Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00498
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robinson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2026cv02227
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Robinson
Defendant:
Mike Johnson, Marco Rubio, Scott Bessent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2026cv02229
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Robinson and Kendall J. Hall
Defendant:
Mike Johnson, Marco Rubio, Scott Bessent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Freeman, II v. Scott Harris, et al
as 25-5422
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Freeman, II
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris, Angela Jiminez, Robert Meek and others
HEDLING v. MEEK et al
as 1:2025cv04062
Plaintiff:
BOREALIS S. HEDLING
Defendant:
ROBERT MEEK and SCOTT S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Mitchem-Green v. Harris et al
as 3:2025cv00964
Petitioner:
Tracie Mitchem-Green
Respondent:
Scott Harris, Angela Jimenez, Supreme Court of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jane Doe v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 25-1555
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE and others
Doe v. The Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 8:2025cv01523
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The Department of Veterans Affairs, The Administrative Office of the United States Courts, The District of Columbia Circuit Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Michael Freeman, II v. Scott Harris, et al
as 25-5126
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Freeman, II
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris, Angela Jiminez, Robert Meek and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
