Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
L.B. v. Simpson County School District et al
as 3:2020cv00704
Defendant:
the Board of Education of Simpson County, Mississippi, Robert Sanders, Antoinette Woodall and others
Plaintiff:
L.B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petrey v. Barlett et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Plaintiff:
William Royal Petrey
Defendant:
Recardo Smith, Robert Sanders, Hon. Judge Gregory Barlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
as 4:2019cv04561
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff:
Bill Sanders and Robert Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McCain v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
Zack McCain
Defendant:
United States of America, Correction Corporation of America, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1425
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCCAIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
ZACK MCCAIN, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
