Cases 1 - 10 of 20
LeBlanc v. Speck Cabinets Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00326
Defendant:
Robert Scott Speck and Speck Cabinets Inc
Plaintiff:
Ronnie LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilcox v. Drew County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2019cv00288
Defendant:
Drew County Circuit Court and Drew County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gill et al
as 1:2018cv00050
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Robert Scott, Blake Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Griswold et al
as 5:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
Austin Cooper
Defendant:
Griswold, Rex G Lay, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philpott et al v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 2:2015cv02017
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Philpott
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Federal Bureau of Narcotics and All Arkansas Police Departments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Storey et al
as 5:2013cv05245
Plaintiff:
James Lee McClain
Defendant:
William Storey, John Threet, Charles Duell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burt v. Hospital Houskeeping Systems, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02151
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Burt
Defendant:
Hospital Houskeeping Systems, LLC and Hospital Housekeeping Systems, LTD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Egziabher v. Duell et al
as 5:2010cv05259
Plaintiff:
Assefa Gabrel Egziabher, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles M. Duell, Robert Scott Parks and Brian Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Osburn et al
as 5:2010cv05218
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Simmons
Defendant:
Captain Randy Osburn, Robert Scott Parks and William A. Story
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dee O'Neal
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Roland Anderson, Hamid Mumtaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
