Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Wynne et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv09955
Plaintiff:
Willis Wynne, Jonathan De Crescenzo, Scott Konig and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Seals v. Maldenaldo et al
as 1:2021cv05574
Plaintiff:
Robert Seals
Defendant:
Judge Maldenaldo and C. T. A. Bus Driver Lady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seals v. Maldenaldo et al
as 3:2021cv01274
Plaintiff:
Robert Seals
Defendant:
Judge Maldenaldo and C. T. A. Bus Driver Lady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordero Seals v. United States
as 21-1350
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cordero Robert Seals
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Cordero Seals v. United States
as 21-1255
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Cordero Robert Seals
(PC) Thomas v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 1:2020cv01679
Defendant:
S. Rosales, M. Armas, B. Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Edward N. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al
as 2:2020cv02326
Defendant:
Elizabeth Stark, Christian Pfeiffer, S. Rosales and others
Plaintiff:
Edward N. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
