Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AYALA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14830
Plaintiff:
LUIS ROBERTO AYALA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Rigoberto Ayala-Duran
as 20-50730
Defendant / Appellant:
Rigoberto Ayala-Duran, also known as Rigoberto Duran, also known as Roberto Duran Ayala, also known as Roberto Ayala, also known as Rigoberto Ayala, also known as Roberto Ayala Duran, also known as Rigoberto Duran-Ayala
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
AYALA v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv04981
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO AYALA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Roberto Ayala Amarilla
as 17-50033
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO AYALA AMARILLAS
AYALA et al v. TITO CONTRACTORS, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01603
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO AYALA , MAURICIO BAUTISTA , GEREMIAS BERGANZA and others
Defendant:
TITO CONTRACTORS, INC. and MAXIMO A. PIEROLA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Ayala v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Roberto Ayala
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , ReconTrust Company, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Funds, $8,392.00 in US et al
as 4:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds, $8,392.00 in US and Funds, $5,100.00 in US
Claimant:
Roberto Ayala and Jose Hernandez Ayala
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Garcia-Valencia v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2007cv01904
Plaintiff:
Enrique Garcia-Valencia
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo-Davila, Jose J. Ramos-Gonzalez, Angel R. Marte-Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
