Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Theron Vinson v. Covil Corporation
as 21-1297
Defendant: COVIL CORPORATION, ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THERON T. VINSON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Kerry D. Vinson and LINDA G. VINSON
William Brock v. Covil Corporation
as 21-1298
Defendant: GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., f/k/a Aqua-Chem, Inc., d/b/a Cleaver-Brooks Division, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE Y. BROCK and WILLIAM L. BROCK
Defendant / Appellee: CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., successor-by-merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a/k/a BF Sturtevant, a Delaware Corporation and COVIL CORPORATION
Intervenor Defendant: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
BKK Working Group et al v. Albertsons Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05836
Plaintiff: Rohr, Inc., Univar USA Inc., Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Defendant: Ciba Geigy Corp., Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp., Friction Inc. and others
Petitioner: Barry Wright Controls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Terry Lee Siegfried et al v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01575
Cross Defendant: 3M Company, A.O. Smith Corp., ABB, Inc. and others
Defendant: 3M Company, A.O. Smith Corp., ABB, Inc. and others
Movant: Gibbs & Cox, Inc.
Cross Claimant: Schneider Electric, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Terri Siegfried and Terry Lee Siegfried
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. v. RADWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 1:2017mc03430
Petitioner: ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.
Respondent: RADWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Request for Judicial Assistance
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Counter Claimant: Clairol, Incorporated, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, United States Department of the Air Force, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Colonial Pipeline Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, United States Navy and others
Plaintiff: DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Appellant: Revere Copper Products, Inc., AKA Revere Copper & Brass Incorporated
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant: EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant: Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
California Department of Toxic Substance Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00729
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co Inc, Ameron International Corporation, Anardarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Plaintiff: California Department of Toxic Substance Control and The California Toxic Substances Control Account
WEISSMAN REALTY, LLC et al v. FEDERAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2014cv00108
Plaintiff: WEISSMAN REALTY, LLC and AVENUE L REALTY LLC
Defendant: FEDERAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC COMPANY, RELIANCE ELECTRIC COMPANY, ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
EBS, Inc. v. Wago Corporation et al
as 1:2012mc91265
Movant: EBS, Inc.
Defendant: Wago Corporation and Wago Kontakttechnik GmbH & Co. KG
Plaintiff: Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?