Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Kinsale Insurance Company v. Phillips et al
as 2:2026cv01779
Plaintiff:
Kinsale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rodney Phillips, Jr., Harlem Tenants Association, Inc. doing business as Harlem Gardens Apartments and Services-Taylor Made, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Phillips v. C.K.S. Packaging, Inc.
as 2:2025cv12729
Plaintiff:
Rodney Phillips
Defendant:
C.K.S. Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Pedregon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11720
Plaintiff:
Fred Pedregon, Katrina Peek, Jennifer Peeler and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carson v. Carroll County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Larry Boatwright Carson
Defendant:
Carroll County, Tennessee, Daniel Inman, Rodney Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States v. Rodney Hill
as 21-3415
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodney Phillip Hill
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Rodney Hill
as 19-1829
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodney Phillip Hill
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Jack Newberry v. W.B. Melton, et al
as 17-5503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACK NEWBERRY
Defendant - Appellant:
W.B. MELTON, SHANNON HARVEY and RODNEY PHILLIPS, Shift Sgt.
Defendant:
DEBBIE DECK, Nurse, ASHLEY DECK, Nurse and OVERTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE
Phillips v. USA
as 6:2016cv03225
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodney Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newberry v. Melton et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jack Newberry
Defendant:
W.B. Melton, Shannon Harvey, Debbie Deck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
