Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Nazario v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Defendant:
Joe Gutierrez and Daniel Crocker
Plaintiff:
Caron Nazario
Petitioner:
Rodney Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodney Riddle v. Mark Greenberger, et al
as 20-3960
Debtor:
In re: RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellant:
RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellee:
MARK A. GREENBERGER, Trustee and ANDREW R. VARA, United States Trustee, Region 9
Rodney Riddle v. Mark Greenberger, et al
as 20-3962
Debtor:
In re: RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellant:
RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellee:
MARK A. GREENBERGER, Trustee and ANDREW R. VARA, United States Trustee, Region 9
Rodney Riddle v. Mark Greenberger, et al
as 20-3901
Debtor:
In re: RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellant:
RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellee:
MARK A. GREENBERGER, Trustee and ANDREW R. VARA, United States Trustee, Region 9
Riddle v. Hamilton County Recorder et al
as 1:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Summit County Domestic Relations Court, Wells Fargo Bank, 9th District Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Rodney Thomas Riddle
as 19-8023
Appellee:
HONORABLE JOHN P. QUINN, SUMMIT COUNTY OHIO CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION AGENCY and MAGISTRATE JANET L. KLECKNER
Debtor:
In re: RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellant:
RODNEY RIDDLE
In re: Rodney Thomas Riddle
as 19-8022
Debtor:
In re: RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellant:
RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, United States Trustee, Region 9 and MARK A. GREENBERGER, Trustee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodney Riddle v. USA
as 15-3366
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY RIDDLE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Riddle et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33156
Plaintiff:
Candy Riddle and Rodney Riddle
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
