Cases 1 - 10 of 494
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Cope et al v. A.I.I Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00728
Defendant:
Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., Unimin Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Belac and Faith Belac Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
BRADFORD v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2019cv00128
Cross Defendant:
CRANE COMPANY, WHEELER PROTECTIVE APPAREL INC, THE GAGE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
DEZURIK INC, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant:
CBS CORPORATION, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION, RAINBIRD CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
MERLE WEST and JANICE E BRADFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
WHERRY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03376
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and others
Cross Defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, PEP BOYS and others
Cross Claimant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, 3M COMPANY, PEERLESS PUMP and others
Plaintiff:
GAIL ANN JAKUBAC-WHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Williamson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01391
Defendant:
Cameron International Corp., Industrial Holdings Corporation f/k/a Carborundum Company, Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant:
The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mercury Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Mercury Casualty Company
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and Whirlpool Corporation
Lineberger et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00390
Plaintiff:
Tommy William Lineberger and Marcella Wilson Lineberger
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, CNA Holdings, Inc., Cooper Industries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHAFFER et al v. ACME BOILER COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv05138
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. SCHAFFER, JR. and SALLY A. MEISNER
Defendant:
ACME BOILER COMPANY, ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., ASBETOS CORPORATION LTD. and others
Cross_claimant:
CBS CORPORATION , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and ASCO VALVES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , ACME BOILER COMPANY, ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
FLORES et al v. BURNHAM BOILER CORPORATION et al
as 5:2016cv02321
Plaintiff:
DALE ROBERT FLORES and ANN FLORES
Defendant:
BURNHAM BOILER CORPORATION, CARRIER CORPORATION, CBS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
HONEYWELL, INC. , CBS CORPORATION and GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
Cross_defendant:
BURNHAM BOILER CORPORATION, CARRIER CORPORATION, CBS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
