Cases 1 - 10 of 22
James Thompson, III v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 23-3193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Thompson, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Minnesota Prisons, Jeffrey T. Titus, Warden, G. Besonen, Lt. and others
Lettieri v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Buearu of Investigation, Wyoming County Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
James Charles Thompson, III
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jeff Titus, G. Besonen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snow v. Roemer
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jarrod Snow
Defendant:
USDC WDNY Magistrate Roemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roemer v. Tirrell
as 2:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Craig Allen Roemer
Defendant:
Kimberly S Tirrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Roemer
as 7:2021cv00554
Defendant:
P.O. Christopher Roemer
Plaintiff:
Mark P. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 17-17449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Burnham v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2016cv40156
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Burnham
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Maura Healey, Dennis P McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 16-16500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Burnham v. Roemer et al
as 4:2016cv40066
Plaintiff:
Arthur A Burnham
Defendant:
John J Roemer and Maura Tansley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
