Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Roemer v. Vladislav et al
as 0:2019cv00416
Defendant:
Korol Vladislav, Precision Truck Lines, Inc. and Anatoliy Smolin
Plaintiff:
John Roemer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Segal et al v. Maryland State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2018cv02731
Defendant:
Maryland State Board of Elections and Linda Lamone
Plaintiff:
Jerome Segal, Michael Hodge and Peter Roemer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kennedy v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01317
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Defendant:
EY, Pillsbury, William E. Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roemer v. The Chapman Law Firm, PA
as 1:2018cv22168
Plaintiff:
Robert Roemer
Defendant:
The Chapman Law Firm, PA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 17-17449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Mingo v. Sprint Corporation
as 2:2017cv02688
Defendant:
Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tijuana Mingo , Alicia Alston , Amber Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Palacios v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 5:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
Rosa E. Palacios
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds and Alan R. Roemer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROEMER v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv04727
Plaintiff:
ALISON S. ROEMER
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roemer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv02117
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Joachim Roemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ahmed et al v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 5:2017cv00336
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds, Advanced Claims Concepts, Tom Long and others
Plaintiff:
Nazneen Ahmed and Syed K Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
