Cases 1 - 10 of 11
W. v. Mendoza
as 23-1317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rebecca W. and Roger Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Danielle Rachlin Mendoza, Rachlin Management Corp. and Georgian House Owners Corp.
W. et al v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2023cv05634
Plaintiff:
Rebecca W. and Roger Davis
Defendant:
Danielle Rachlin Mendoza, Rachlin Management Corp and Georgian House Owners Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Kelly et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Laura Howard, Laura Kelly, Kaylene Brin and others
Plaintiff:
Paul T Matthews, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv04004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00594
Plaintiff:
Roger Davis
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Town of Hempstead
as 14-352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roger Davis and Roger Davis, as POA for Martin Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Nassau County, Town of Hempstead Department of Buildings, Ray Schwarz and others
Davis v. Holsapple, et al
as 0:2013cv02150
Plaintiff:
Roger Davis
Defendant:
Joseph Holsapple, Joseph Zebro, Cass County and others
Davis v. Surrogates Court of the State
as 13-564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roger Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Surrogates Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, John B. Riordan, in his individual and official capacity, Sally Donohoe, in her individual and official capacity and others
Davis v. Surrogates Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau et al
as 2:2010cv05691
Plaintiff:
Roger Davis
Defendant:
Sally Donohoe, Teresa Padilla, Hon. John B. Riordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
