Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Colvin, Jr. et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2023cv02767
Plaintiff:
Leonard Colvin, Jr. and Michael Peace, Jr.
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Stephen Tilton, James Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weigman v. Wertz
as 2:2022cv02112
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Weigman
Defendant:
Ed Wertz, Andy Strove, Linda Rold and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55402
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L ROLD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARCIA ROLD\AN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/7:20-CV-25038
Plaintiff:
GARCIA ROLD\AN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 17-3405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Kettely Laraque, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as a memeber of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as a member of the NYS Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
In re: State of New York
as 17-310
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
State of New York and William J. Rold
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Southern District, (New York City)
Defendant:
Raff & Becker, L.L.P., David Alan Raff, Robert L. Becker and others
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 17-160
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, on behalf of the employees it represents, Kettely Laraque, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
Barcia v. Sitkin
as 16-3575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Nidia Barcia, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Municipal Labor Committee, on behalf of the employees it represents, Kettely Laraque, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Sitkin, Individually and as Chairman of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, James R. Rhone, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, Arthur Strauss, Individually and as members of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
William J. Rold
Intervenor:
New York State United Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, The United Federation of Teachers Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, Dolores Cantrell, Teachers Union and others
Brewster v. Rold
as 4:2016cv01447
Plaintiff:
Cenious Brewster
Defendant:
Rold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
