Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00959
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carswell #821516 v. Rykse et al
as 1:2021cv01041
Plaintiff:
Romaro Ray Carswell #821516, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Rykse, Unknown Cunningham, Bouck Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ettiene-Modeste v. Hartford Police Dept., et al
as 3:2021cv00200
Defendant:
John Builous, II, Hartford Police Dept., Farmington Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter M. Ettiene-Modeste and Dexter Ettiene-Modeste, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Session
as 18-1946
Petitioner:
Romaro Barnes, AKA Romaro Donovan Barnes
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
VINASCO v. Swissport Cargo Services, LP
as 4:2018cv01902
Plaintiff:
INGRID L VINASCO, Nicholas Johnson, Jvon Robertson and others
Defendant:
Swissport USA, Inc. and Swissport Cargo Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Loftus et al
as 1:2017cv23524
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith
Defendant:
Jonathan Loftus, B. Romaro, Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Cuevas et al
as 1:2017cv23341
Defendant:
Director Thomas Kane, Lieutenant Gwinn, Counselor E. Cuevas and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Leon Hammonds, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith , Morris Borden , Romaro R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dwight Branch v. Mike Pearce
as 15-50822
Petitioner - Appellant:
DWIGHT ROMARO BRANCH
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE PEARCE, Warden at Federal Correctional Institution Bastrop
Branch v. Pearce
as 1:2014cv00684
Plaintiff:
Dwight Romaro Branch
Defendant:
Mike Pearce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
