Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Clark v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Ronald P Clark
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
RONALD WAYNE CLARK, JR
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and JPAY LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Ronald Clark
as 22-15305
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD HASSAN CLARK
Curry, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation, City of Obetz Police Department, Franklin County, Ohio Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity action.
Clark v. North County San Diego et al
as 1:2021cv05307
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
North County San Diego, City of Vista, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv05206
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
Stephani Williams, Jena Irvin and Cobb County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Georgia Dept. of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities et al
as 1:2021cv05207
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
Georgia Dept. of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Judy Fritzgerald, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
Warden Antoine Caldwell, Johnson State Prison, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
