Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ronald Emrit v. British Secret Service
as 23-1174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITISH SECRET SERVICE, CENTRAL AUTHORITY OF ENGLAND, HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE LITIGATION and others
Ronald Emrit v. British Secret Service
as 23-1172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITISH SECRET SERVICE, CENTRAL AUTHORITY OF ENGLAND, HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE LITIGATION and others
Emrit v. British Secret Service et al
as 3:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
British Secret Service, Central Authority of England, Hague Conference on Private Litigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit v. British Secret Service et al
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
British Secret Service, Central Authority of England, Hague Conference on Private Litigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ronald Emrit v. Special Agent
as 23-1030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE, Southern District of New York (SDNY)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. Secretary of the Navy
as 23-1027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
