Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Emrit v. Jules
as 3:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Emrit v. Jules
as 4:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Jules
as 4:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Jules
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Emrit v. Jules
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ronald Emrit v. CIA, et al
as 22-1897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, Director of National Intelligence and National Security Council
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals, et al
as 22-1893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Board of Immigration Appeals, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Customs and Border Patrol and others
Ronald Emrit v. CIA, et al
as 22-1833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, also known as CIA, Director of National Intelligence and National Security Council
Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 4:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Board of Immigration Appeals, Citizenship & Immigration Services, Customs and Border Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
