Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ronald Emrit v. Progressive Insurance Company, et al
as 24-10413
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE and STEPHANIE COURTNEY
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs, et al.
as 4:2024cv00201
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EMRIT v. COMBS et al
as 4:2024cv00007
Defendant:
SEAN P COMBS, P DIDDY, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 8:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P.Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs
as 24-1148
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN P.DIDDY COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
EMRIT v. COMBS et al
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN "P. DIDDY& COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, ATLANTIC RECORDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
