Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bell v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02479
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Morrison et al
as 2:2018cv03866
Defendant:
Hul Hul T.V., N.J. Shore, Keisha Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronnie Bell v. Elton Matthew
as 15-4754
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Movant - Appellant:
RONNIE BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ELTON MATTHEWS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patterson v. After Life and After Death et al
as 1:2015cv02709
Plaintiff:
Alexander Patterson, IV
Defendant:
After Life and After Death, After Beyond Forsyth Flames Club Civil, Ronnie Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byars v. Murwin et al
as 3:2014cv00075
Defendant:
Banner Churchill Conty Hospital, Ronnie Bell, Churchill County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Byars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ronnie Bell v. SSA Terminals and Homeport Ins, et al
as 14-70218
Petitioner:
RONNIE BELL, to the Use of Eric A. Dupree
Respondent:
SSA TERMINALS AND HOMEPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
SSA Terminals and Homeport Ins v. Ronnie Bell, et al
as 14-70201
Petitioner:
SSA TERMINALS AND HOMEPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
RONNIE BELL and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Paschall et al
as 2:2009cv03673
Plaintiff:
Philip Morris USA Inc. and Philip Morris USA Inc.
Defendant:
Denise Paschall, Norman Bell, Ronnie Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
