Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Walker v. Ray et al
as 2:2017cv00184
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Walker
Defendant: Tracy Ray, Gregory L. Holloway, W. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teresa Brooks et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01965
Plaintiff: Teresa Brooks , Shelia Baker , Linda Barnes and others
Defendant: Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00873
Plaintiff: Shirley Walker and Roosevelt Walker
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darryl McKenzie v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 11-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL MCKENZIE, MORRIS LAWN AND LANDSCAPE, TIMOTHY ARD and others
Petitioner: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant - Appellant: WILLIAM HALL, DAISIAH WHACK, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, ROOSEVELT WALKER and others
Movant: ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Jessica Curtis v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1829
Plaintiff - Appellant: JESSICA CURTIS, TIMOTHY ARD, JAMES SPLAWN and others
Petitioner: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant - Appellant: DW, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne; Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, WILLIAM HALL, ROOSEVELT WALKER and others
Movant: ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Elizabeth Cutright v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 10-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Plaintiff: TINA BEVINGTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JESSICA CURTIS, TIMOTHY ARD and others
Petitioner: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant: ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10, Norfolk Southern Railway Crewmembers and Residents of South Carolina
Walker v. Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00607
Petitioner: Roosevelt Walker
Respondent: Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christy Dalton v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 09-2366
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, TINA BEVINGTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JESSICA CURTIS and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant - None: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Movant - None: ROOSEVELT WALKER, DW, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne; Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, WILLIAM HALL and others
Walker v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 2:2009cv00522
Petitioner: Roosevelt Walker, III
Respondent: Director, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cutright, et al v. Norfolk Southern, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2005cv00115
Plaintiff: Elizabeth R Cutright, Tina Bevington, Jessica Curtis and others
Petitioner: Christy T Dalton, Robert M Bell, Erwin J Leizerman and others
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, John Does 1 thru 10 and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Interested Party: Douglas Schmidt
Not Classified By Court: Barry Cook, Lewis Frye, Dana Younce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?