Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ROPES & GRAY LLP. v. U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv03511
Plaintiff:
ROPES & GRAY LLP.
Defendant:
U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Cruz v. IBM Corporation, et al
as 19-1963
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM LAFFERTY, Lowell PD Detective, DAVID RUDE, IBM Manager, JOHN F. AKERS, IBM Chairman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS A. CRUZ
Grazyna Grezak v. Ropes & Gray LLP, et al
as 19-1856
Defendant:
GARBARINI & SCHER P.C. (G&S) and DARIUS A. MARZEC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAZYNA S. GREZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, AISHA BAMS, Court Deputy of Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman SDNY (Bams) and ROPES & GRAY, RP
Van Vuuren v. Ropes & Gray LLP
as 1:2018cv10253
Plaintiff:
W. Hugo Van Vuuren
Defendant:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nobile v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv20009
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Nobile
Defendant:
United States of America, Frank De Pasquale, Francis J. D. Mento & Bradly Pinta Pres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ropes & Gray LLP v. K&S Consulting LLC
as 1:2016cv10152
Plaintiff:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Defendant:
K&S Consulting LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grezak v. Ropes & Gray, LLP et al
as 3:2015cv02111
Plaintiff:
Grazyna S Grezak
Defendant:
Ropes & Gray, LLP, Beth X Finkelstein, Meera Nair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
