Cases 31 - 40 of 631
Rosario v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02726
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rosario
Defendant:
Lieutenant Williams, Correctional Officer Flemings, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02476
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MERCADO-ROSARIO v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
LUIS ANTONIO MERCADO-ROSARIO
Respondent:
WARDEN UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Solek v. Pagnoni et al
as 3:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Timothy Solek and Tim Solek
Defendant:
Joseph Pagnoni, Mr. Santana, Milna Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Paul E Neal
Defendant:
A Oliver, K Rosario, D Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Streevel
as 7:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Misael Rosario Pacheco, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosario v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00253
Petitioner:
Luis Rosario
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROSARIO v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
FERNANDO ROSARIO
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Gates, Jr. v. Lee County, et al
as 23-10353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. GATES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE COUNTY, LEE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, LEE COUNTY JAIL and others
ROSARIO v. HOLLOWOOD et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HOLLOWOOD, C.O.1. PHILLIPS, C.O.1. RIGGLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
