Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01183
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Barnes et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Bose Barnes and Rose Barnes
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51729
Plaintiff:
Rose Barnes
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barnes v. Astrue et al
as 5:2012cv00696
Plaintiff:
Hilda Rose Barnes
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue , Eric Holder, Jr., Office of Program Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes et al v. Recreation By Design, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv05595
Plaintiff:
Rose Barnes, Rose Barnes, Rose Barnes and others
Defendant:
Recreation By Design, LLC, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Barnes et al v. Recreation By Design, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00461
Plaintiff:
Rose Barnes, Sade E. Barnes, James Norman Gallagher and others
Defendant:
Recreation By Design, LLC, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bolar v. Hashmi et al
as 1:2007cv05445
Petitioner:
Sheila M. Bolar
Respondent:
Hashmi, Empinado-Tse, Jan Li and others
Defendant:
Steven Rubel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
