Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sherwood et al v. Roto-Rooter Services Company, d/b/a Roto-Rooter Services Company Branch #620
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Krista Sherwood and Travis Gibbons
Defendant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company, d/b/a Roto-Rooter Services Company Branch #620 and Roto-Rooter Services Company, doing business as Roto-Rooter Services Company Branch #620
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy #B1230AP56189A16 et al v. Roto-Rooter Services Company
as 1:2020cv01051
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy #B1230AP56189A16 and King Street Metroplace POA, Inc.
Defendant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company doing business as Roto-Rooter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whitfield et al v. Liberty Mutual Group Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02108
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Roto-Rooter Serv Co, Stanley Steemer International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charline whitfield and Curtis Nelson
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Elizalde et al v. Aimco Maple Bay, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jasmine N. Elizalde , Jason D. Elizalde and Jasmine Elizalde
Defendant:
Aimco Maple Bay, LLC , OP Property Management, LLC and Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridgette Neal v. Duke Energy
as 12-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGETTE NEAL, a/k/a Bridgette T. Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY, PIKE ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC WORKS and others
Neal v. ORS et al
as 6:2012cv01995
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Duke Energy et al
as 6:2011cv01420
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
