Cases 1 - 10 of 21
ROTUNDO v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04211
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ROTUNDO
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cesario et al v. Vistagen Therapeutics Inc et al
as 2:2026cv01128
Plaintiff:
John Cesario and David Preka
Defendant:
Shawn K. Singh, John S. Saxe, Jerry Gin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Cesario et al v. Vistagen Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 4:2025cv01510
Plaintiff:
John Cesario and David Preka
Defendant:
Vistagen Therapeutics Inc., John S. Saxe, Jerry Gin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Rotundo v. Underwood
as 3:2018cv02274
Petitioner:
Nicholas Rotundo
Respondent:
M Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rotundo v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06276
Plaintiff:
Joyce Rotundo
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cabezudo-Rivera v. The City of Norwich et al
as 3:2014cv00639
Plaintiff:
Samuel Cabezudo-Rivera
Defendant:
The City of Norwich , Brandon M. Clarke , Michael A. Purdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotundo v. Garcia
as 1:2012cv24304
Defendant:
Danilo Garcia
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rotundo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Scimone et al v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv23505
Plaintiff:
GEOFFREY SCIMONE , NANCY SCIMONE , MARIO LOFARO and others
Defendant:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION , CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC , COSTA CRUISE LINES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
