Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Robinson v. Katukooi et al
as 2:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Cazondra L Robinson
Defendant:
Shashi Krishna Katukooi, Ashford Rowell and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowell v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Jamarkus A. Rowell
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jervis Brown, Hernaadis Harmon, Barry Cobb and others
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeVaughn v. Sheffield, Alabama, City of et al
as 3:2021cv01086
Plaintiff:
Sebastian DeVaughn
Defendant:
Sheffield, Alabama, City of, Ricky Terry, Drake Seal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray et al v. Baptist Health System et al
as 2:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gray and Margaret Santorello
Defendant:
Rowell Ashford, Baptist Health System doing business as Princeton Baptist Medical Center, Sheila Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rowell v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00647
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ann Rowell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
