Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mustion et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Zane Mustion, Curtis Wright, Ronald Trotter and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
MOSES v. TATE et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
JASON S MOSES
Defendant:
JOHN TATE, ROY WADE, BAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krueger v. Arledge et al
as 5:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Defendant:
Roy Wade Arledge, Texas Board of Pardons & Parole, Central Division, Austin, TX and TDCJ-ID Institutional Division, Huntsville, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv02703
Plaintiff:
Roy Wade
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wade v. Monsanto Company
as 9:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Roy Wade
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARNES v. CARMEUSE LIME AND STONE et al
as 5:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BARNES
Defendant:
CARMEUSE LIME AND STONE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rodriguez v. Bobo et al
as 3:2010cv01134
Plaintiff:
Allen Lee Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ronald Bobo, M McClendon, Haig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Weis et al
as 1:2009cv01793
Plaintiff:
Roy Wade
Defendant:
Joey Weis, OBrain, OMolly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE et al
as 2:2008cv02943
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WILLIAMS, DEBORAH WILLIAMS, DEBORAH WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
