Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Estrada v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv09639
Plaintiff:
Ruben Estrada
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilrub Enterprises, Inc. v. Darryl J. Evans II et al
as 2:2019cv03107
Defendant:
Seung Hee Lee, Darryl J. Evans, II, Dora Riestra and others
Plaintiff:
Wilrub Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Michael Estrada v. Joyce Parmenter, et al
as 17-10613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RUBEN ESTRADA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOYCE PARMENTER, Facility Health Administrator, Covenant Health Care, THOMAS PARLAU, MA and KATHRYNE MCNEIL, MD
Michael Estrada v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10300
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RUBEN ESTRADA
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Estrada v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2016cv00198
Petitioner:
Michael Ruben Estrada
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estrada v. Parmenter et al
as 5:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruben Estrada
Defendant:
Joyce Parmenter, Thomas Parlau and Kathryne McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estrada v. Industrial Transit, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00013
Defendant:
Robert Barber and Industrial Transit, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ruben Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Puckett et al v. Irwin County Detention Center
as 7:2008cv00061
Plaintiff:
Luther Puckett, James Donaldson, Jose Arellano and others
Defendant:
Irwin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
