Cases 1 - 10 of 57
RUFFIN v. USA
as 1:2023cv01131
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RAVON RUFFIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ruffin v. CVS Health Corp
as 7:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ruffin
Defendant:
CVS Health Corp and CVS Pharmacy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Haze v. Medical Provider et al
as 5:2023ct03300
Plaintiff:
Grant Ruffin Haze, III
Defendant:
Medical Provider, Nurse Jane Doe 1, Nurse Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haze et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03055
Plaintiff:
Divine Pollard, Curtis Cardwell, Linwood Duffie and others
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike and Governor Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFFIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAVON RUFFIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Hall v. Deck-Brown et al
as 5:2020cv00559
Defendant:
M O Glen, John Doe VI, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Darnell Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mojarrad v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina et al
as 5:2020cv00396
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, North Carolina, William Brett Edwards, Cassandra Deck-Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Siavash L. Mojarrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Inch et al
as 5:2019ct03356
Defendant:
Counselor Denson, B. Coor, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Burl Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUFFIN, v. HARTWICK, et al
as 1:2019cv00800
Defendant:
CARGO SOLUTIONS CO, INC., BAY SHIPPERS and WILLIAM BRIAN HARTWICK
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LAMAR RUFFIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Defense Commissary Agency et al
as 5:2018cv00380
Plaintiff:
Luis Francisco Ramos
Defendant:
Defense Commissary Agency, Linda Ruffin, Kimberly Vartanian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
