Cases 1 - 10 of 25
MCKISSIC v. ZIEGLER et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
CARLTON STEVE MCKISSIC
Defendant:
Corporal SHERRY ZIEGLER, VALERIE HOLDER, R T BOREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Rumer et al
as 2:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Skye A. Woods and Joshua A. Woods
Defendant:
Kristine Rumer, Annette Chambers and Anette Chambers Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herman Morris, Jr. v. William Rumer
as 23-13997
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM C. RUMER
BENNETT v. BALL et al
as 2:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
SAMANTHA BALL, DYLAN RUMER, MICHAEL HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. RUMER
as 4:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
Judge WILLIAM C RUMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELLAMY v. RUMER et al
as 4:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BELLAMY and MICHAEL D JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM C RUMER, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and JULIA SLATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellamy v. Rumer et al
as 1:2020cv02554
Plaintiff:
George Bellamy
Defendant:
Judge William C. Rumer, Superior Court of Muscogee County and Julia Slater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Stewart et al
as 8:2017cv01916
Defendant:
Mr. Demer, Charles Samuel, Jr, Mrs. J. Hamilton-Rumer and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Interested Party:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Isner v. Stewart et al
as 1:2017cv01444
Plaintiff:
Montgomery J. Isner
Defendant:
Timothy Stewart, Mohamed Moubarek, Tom Gera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 17-3007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, ROB L. JEFFREYS, Warden, L C COVAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
