Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LOWERY v. CENTURION CORPORATION et al
as 1:2026cv02389
Defendant:
STEPHANIE RILEY, WINNINGHAM, RUNYON and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. LOWERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Ranson et al
as 2:2026cv00699
Defendant:
Ofc. Fowler, Booking Ofc. Mickey, Booking Ofc. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Runyon et al
as 2:2026cv00703
Defendant:
Sgt. Hayes, Cpl. Dustin McCoy and Cpl Cassady Runyon
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. RILEY et al
as 2:2026cv00699
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
STEPHANIE RILEY, THOMAS MILLIKAN, RUNYON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X, LLC, et al.
as 26-7024
:
IMPOSSIBLE FOODS INC., a Delaware corporation, IMPOSSIBLE X, LLC, a Texas limited liability company and JOEL RUNYON
Runyon v. Hunter et al
as 2:2026cv00675
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Runyon
Defendant:
Thomas Hunter, Matthew Ranson, David Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X, LLC, et al.
as 26-6802
:
IMPOSSIBLE FOODS INC., a Delaware corporation, IMPOSSIBLE X, LLC, a Texas limited liability company and JOEL RUNYON
Runyon v. Warden of FCI Schuylkill
as 3:2026cv03076
Petitioner:
David Runyon
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marcum v. Thompson et al
as 3:2026cv00584
Plaintiff:
Gary Franklin Marcum
Defendant:
Richard Thompson, Dustin Shreve, Steven Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Runyon v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv00562
Plaintiff:
Chad Lee Runyon
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
