Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rush v. Davis-Stuart, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Anethra Coleman, Anthony Dalmer, Scott Brewer and others
Defendant:
Davis-Stuart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Rushing v. Science Applications Internation Corporation
as 1:2019cv02360
Plaintiff:
Marla J Rushing
Defendant:
Science Applications Internation Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Warner v. Rush Espresso Cafe, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Paul McConachy and Rush Espresso Cafe, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jersey Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chado et al v. National Auto Inspections, LLC
as 1:2017cv02945
Plaintiff:
William Rush, Ian Chado, Nancy Nguyen and others
Defendant:
National Auto Inspections, LLC, Jason Goldsmith and Carchex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
David Rushing v. Bolt Express LLC
as 16-2142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RUSHING
Defendant - Appellee:
BOLT EXPRESS LLC
Defendant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, BALDWIN & LYONS INC and TRANSPORT INSURANCE AGENCY INC
Rush v. Aetna Health, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00773
Plaintiff:
Emily Rush
Defendant:
Aetna Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon v. Rush Trucking Corporation
as 2:2014cv25502
Plaintiff:
Tama Gordon
Defendant:
Rush Trucking Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perry v. Rush Trucking Company
as 3:2011cv00957
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Perry
Defendant:
Rush Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Rushing v. Brown Auto Collision Center
as 3:2010cv00026
Defendant:
Brown Auto Collision Center
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Rushing, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rushing v. CIGNA Corporation d/b/a Cigna Group Insurance et al
as 3:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rushing
Defendant:
CIGNA Corporation, Fenner Dunlop, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan and ACS Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
