Cases 11 - 20 of 86
RUSH v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
DAMON RUSH
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUSHING v. WILLIAM et al
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. RUSHING
Defendant:
PATRICIA WILLIAM, JASON CARTER, CENTURIUN MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carruthers v. Elkhart County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00803
Plaintiff:
Antwan M Carruthers, Eye Keyla M Carruthers Washington and Antwan M Carruthers Washington
Defendant:
Elkhart County Jail, ECCC, Danley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANBLAIR v. RUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 1:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
BRANDON VANBLAIR
Defendant:
RUSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., RUSH COUNTY INDIANA, INDIANA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Slater v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Cortrez D Slater
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Loretta H Rush, Tom Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOGAN-BEY v. RUSH
as 1:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
J. BOGAN-BEY
Defendant:
LORETTA H. RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSHING v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. RUSHING
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL and REGIONAL MEDICAL DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPARGER-WITHERS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2021cv02824
Plaintiff:
AMYA SPARGER-WITHERS
Defendant:
JOSHUA N. TAYLOR, BLACKFORD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, DEARBORN AND OHIO COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, JUDITH PROFFITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, MICHELLE MCCUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
