Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Everett v. Barnes et al
as 1:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derek Everett
Defendant:
Michelle Barnes, Natalie Vimont, Tamara Krieger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURRAY v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2022cv03542
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF RUSSELL MURRAY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHILLIP D. MURPHY, ADMINISTRATOR JUDITH M. PERSICHILLI, MERRY HEART ASSISTED LIVING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murray v. Britton et al
as 6:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Russel Murray
Defendant:
Rodney Jude Britton and MC Trucking and Shredding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Murray v. Clayton
as 4:2022cv00183
Petitioner:
Nicholas Russell Murray
Respondent:
Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02439
Plaintiff:
JOEL RUSSELL MURRAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tharpe et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv06033
Plaintiff:
William L. Pokryfke, Tony D. Woods, Karin Jeffress and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv47108
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RUSSELL MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Tso v. Murray et al
as 1:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Rebecca Murray, Ross B.H. Buchanan, Russell Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert T. Tso
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
USA v. Ted Murray
as 13-20527
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TED RUSSELL MURRAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
