Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Flinders v. DCFS et al
as 2:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Ivy Flinders
Defendant:
DCFS, Hannah Withers, Ruth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00586
Plaintiff:
Ruth Nelson
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEEPLES et al v. OMEGA FLEX INC.
as 3:2020cv00005
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PEEPLES, US COASTAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, RUTH PEEPLES and others
Defendant:
OMEGA FLEX INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08684
Plaintiff:
Bethene Ruth Nelson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Police Officer Clayton et al
as 6:2017cv01150
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Police Officer Clayton, Police Officer Simons, Kiesha Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wilford et al
as 6:2017cv00945
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Mike Wilford, D. Hernandaze, Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pratt et al
as 6:2017cv00827
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Kiesha Pratt, Kiesha First Lady Pratt, Fox Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01384
Plaintiff:
Ruth Nelson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Pratt et al
as 6:2017cv00804
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Keisha first lady Pratt, Keisha Pratt, Fox Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pratt et al
as 6:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Kiesha First Lady Pratt, Kiesha Pratt, Fox Lamb #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
