Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
AMERIKOHL MINING, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 2:2017cv01271
Plaintiff: AMERIKOHL MINING, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and RYAN K. ZINKE
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1276
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv01287
Plaintiff: Chinook Indian Nation and Anthony A. Johnson
Defendant: Ryan K. Zinke, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Federal Acknowledgment and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Chinook Indian Nation et al v. Zinke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05668
Plaintiff: Chinook Indian Nation and Anthony A. Johnson
Defendant: Ryan K. Zinke, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Federal Acknowledgment and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Alaska, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-35618
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF ALASKA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKANS FOR WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF ALASKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES and others
Movant - Appellant: RONALD T. WEST, Proposed Intervenor
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlif, et al
as 17-16500
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary of the Interior and GREG SHEEHAN, Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor-Defendant: SISKIYOU COUNTY, DOUGLAS COUNTY, Oregon, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation and others
California Valley Miwok Tribe, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-16321
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, ANJELICA PAULK, SILVIA BURLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Interior, MICHAEL BLACK, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of Interior-Indian Affairs and WELDON LOUDERMILK, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE TRIBAL COUNCIL, YAKIMA DIXIE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2017cv02017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jay Hymas v. United States Department of In, et al
as 17-35398
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAY HYMAS, DBA Dosmen Farms
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, JAMES W. KURTH, Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Franks Landing Indian Communit v. National Indian Gaming Commiss, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35368
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANKS LANDING INDIAN COMMUNITY, A federally-recognized self-governing dependent Indian community
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, JONODEV CHAUDHURI, In his official capacity as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00219
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?