Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Harkey v. Stange
as 1:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
Ryan Perry Harkey
Respondent:
William Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perri v. Stephen E. Croskrey et al.
as 1:2021cv01423
Plaintiff:
Ryan Perri
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Christy Basco and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
PERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96972
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moody v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ryan Perry Moody
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MCCOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv21214
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN PERRY MCCOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Hellmuth v. City of Trenton, OH, et al
as 19-4016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL L. HELLMUTH
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD MILLER, Vice Mayor, CITY OF TRENTON, OH, RYAN PERRY and others
PERRY et al v. UPROXX, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv18868
Plaintiff:
CRAWLSPACE INTERACTIVE LLC and RYAN PERRY
Defendant:
WOVEXX SUBSIDIARY, INC., WOVEXX HOLDINGS, INC., JARETT MYER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hellmuth v. City of Trenton, Ohio et al
as 1:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Richard Miller, Ryan Montgomery, City of Trenton, Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Hellmuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ryan & James LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00493
Defendant:
Catrinna Perry, Ryan Perry, James Warren and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Ryan Perry v. Cable News Network, Inc., et al
as 16-13031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Delaware corporation and CNN INTERACTIVE GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
