Cases 11 - 17 of 17
John Harmon, et al v. Hamilton County, Ohio, et al
as 15-4125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN HARMON and STEPHANIE HARMON
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SHERIFF, HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN COX, RYAN WOLF, MATTHEW WISSEL and others
John Harmon, et al v. Hamilton County, Ohio, et al
as 15-4117
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN HARMON and STEPHANIE HARMON
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SHERIFF, HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RYAN WOLF, MATTHEW WISSEL, JOHN HAYNES, Patrol Officers, In their Official and Individual Capacities and others
William Philips et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2014cv02989
Plaintiff:
William Philips, Phillip Clay Cecil, Robert Halsey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Wolfe v. Big Rays Quick Lube Grand Rapids, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01287
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wolfe
Defendant:
Big Rays Quick Lube Grand Rapids, Inc., Ravi Eid and Fadi Yahya
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ryan Wolfe v. James Meziere, et al
as 13-60611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN WOLFE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MEZIERE, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Olive Branch, Mississippi and LAWRENCE VAUGHN, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Olive Branch, Mississippi
Wolfe v. Meziere et al
as 3:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wolfe
Defendant:
James Meziere and Lawrence Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon et al v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2010cv00911
Plaintiff:
John Harmon and Stephanie Harmon
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio , Hamilton County Board of County Commissioners , Sheriff, Hamilton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
