Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Rogers v. Velez #7857 et al
as 1:2023cv03437
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
P.O. Velez #7857, P.O. S. Carter #7425 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carter v. The State of et al
as 3:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Alvin S. Carter
Defendant:
The State of, The County of and The City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carter v. State of Texas
as 4:2022cv00872
Plaintiff:
Alvin S. Carter
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera et al v. Bay View Gardens/Newport Leasing et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Linwood L. Rivera and Trayneka S. Carter
Defendant:
Bay View Gardens/Newport Leasing, B H management, Celtic Hills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cecilia Vargas et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2020cv02646
Defendant:
J. Jimenez, Z. Pritchett, Z. Vogel and others
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Vargas and Ariana Salas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Stafford County Hospital et al
as 6:2017cv01284
Plaintiff:
Fredrick J. Farmer
Defendant:
Stafford County Hospital , Richard S. Carter , Carter Professional Care Stafford, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohen v. Jay Z / Shawn S. Carter
as 3:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Charles Cameron Cohen
Defendant:
Jay Z / Shawn S. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Electronic Surveillance Department of the NKDSF et al
as 2:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Darlene S. Carter
Defendant:
Electronic Surveillance Department of the NKDSF and FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El Ghouleh v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv05825
Plaintiff:
Kahreem El Ghouleh
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Israel Gamez, Louis Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
