Cases 1 - 10 of 135
MRC Associates, LLC v. Cook
as 1:2024cv01261
Plaintiff:
MRC Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Bruce S. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Etha Jones, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Welsh v. Allred et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Welsh
Defendant:
Allred, Cox, Tasheen S. Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES et al v. COUNTY OF MARION et al
as 1:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES and ERIC D. DYCUS, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARION, KENNETH S. COOKE, JENEA N. MCNEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 23-5929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Heimlich v. United States et al
as 4:2023cv03951
Plaintiff:
Edmund Heimlich
Defendant:
United States, State Of Texas, Michael Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03905
Plaintiff:
SEAN S COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
