Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Frederick Foster v. Joel Slomsky, et al
as 23-1298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CHRISTOPHER A. LEWIS, JONATHAN S. GOLDMAN and others
Frederick Foster v. Joel Slomsky, et al
as 22-3105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CHRISTOPHER A. LEWIS, JONATHAN S. GOLDMAN and others
FOSTER v. SLOMSKY et al
as 2:2022cv03349
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. FOSTER
Defendant:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CLERKS TO BE NAMED, LANDON Y. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. WEINER et al
as 2:2016cv07096
Plaintiff:
FRANK J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
RICHARD J. WEINER, DONALD S. GOLDMAN, MAURICE GALLIPOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. WEINER et al
as 2:2016cv00811
Plaintiff:
FRANK J TAYLOR
Defendant:
RICHARD J. WEINER, DONALD S. GOLDMAN, MAURICE GALLIPOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abuhouran v. United States of America
as 15-2271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKTHAM ABUHOURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DAVID L. WINN, CAROLYN A. SABOL, DR. SANDRA HOWARD and others
Abuhouran v. United States of America
as 15-2195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AKTHAM ABUHOURAN
Defendant:
DAVID L. WINN, CAROLYN A. SABOL, DR. SANDRA HOWARD and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
TAYLOR v. WIENER et al
as 2:2014cv05560
Plaintiff:
FRANK J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
RICHARD J. WIENER, ESQ., KATHRYN BROCK, MAURICE J. CALLIPOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. WEINER et al
as 2:2014cv04208
Plaintiff:
FRANK J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
RICHARD J. WEINER, DONALD S. GOLDMAN, MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abuhouran v. Winn et al
as 4:2007cv40201
Plaintiff:
Aktham Abuhouran
Defendant:
David L. Winn, Carolyn Sabol, Sandra Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
