Cases 1 - 10 of 98
(PC) Harris v. Ceballos
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Earnest S. Harris
Defendant:
I. Ceballos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa #350727 v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Scott S Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dyer v. U.S. Supreme Court et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jewel Dyer
Defendant:
U.S. Supreme Court, Scott S. Harris and Sara Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helen Le v. USPS, et al
as 23-15816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELEN LE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CEO, Director, Supervisor and SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk at Supreme Court of US
James Miller v. Scott Harris
as 23-55371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, Individual and Official Capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James L. Miller v. Scott S. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
James L. Miller
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Demos, Jr. v. John Roberts, et al
as 22-36069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GEORGE ROBERTS, SARA SIMMONS and SCOTT S. HARRIS
Demos v. Roberts et al
as 2:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
John George Roberts, Sara Simmons and Scott S Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
