Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Releana, LLC v. Stephens et al
as 1:2018rj00003
Plaintiff:
Releana, LLC
Defendant:
Deirdre Sue Stephens, Deirdre S. Stephens Revocable Trust, Sarah Tuntland Alberg and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgments
Stephens v. The Kroger Company
as 1:2018cv00765
Plaintiff:
Michelle S. Stephens
Defendant:
The Kroger Company
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Releana, LLC v. Deirdre Sue Stephens et al
as 8:2017cv02097
Defendant:
Dierdre S Stephens Revocable Trust, Yorkshire Enterprise LP, Dierdre Sue Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Releana, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stephens v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00434
Plaintiff:
Stacy S Stephens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Releana, LLC v. Deirdre Sue Stephens et al
as 8:2017mc00024
Defendant:
Sarah Tuntland Alberg, Dierdre S Stephens Revocable Trust, Dierdre Sue Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Releana, LLC
Stephens v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Stacy S Stephens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Patton et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03000
Plaintiff:
Mary M. Patton and S. Stephen Patton
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patton et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as GAN/4:17-cv-00212
Plaintiff:
Mary M. Patton and S. Stephen Patton
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Patton et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Mary M. Patton and S. Stephen Patton
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norwood et al v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2017cv06494
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Norwood and Aramis Somerville
Defendant:
Village of Dolton , D. Johnson , R. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
