Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2023hc02169
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher S. Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant:
MS. S. WILLIAMS, MR. HON BARRIER and MR. SHULER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. FRICK, et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant:
MR. J. FRICK and MS. S. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 5:2020ct03064
Defendant:
Patterson, Judge Charles J. Siragusa, M.C.J. Lt. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Warden J. C. Holland, Dr. Gillespie Wadsworth and Counselor Mrs. Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Holland
as 5:2016hc02274
Petitioner:
Chad S. Williams
Respondent:
J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Wadsworth et al
as 5:2016ct03302
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Gillespie Wadsworth, Mrs. Wiggins and J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Winston et al v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Braxton David Winston, II , Danielle Adele Hilton Lombard , Jamie Marsicano and others
Defendant:
City of Charlotte and Kerr Putney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Smith
as 5:2015hc02278
Petitioner:
Randall S. Williams
Respondent:
Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FUNDERBURK v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2014cv00675
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC DION FUNDERBURK
Defendant:
S. DICKERSON, J. S. FLOYD, J. E. SWAIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Guice et al
as 5:2013ct03150
Plaintiff:
Roderick S. Williams
Defendant:
W. David Guice, George T. Solomon, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
