Cases 1 - 10 of 23
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MALIK et al
as 2:2021cv20300
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
USAMA MALIK and LAUREN S WOOD
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Hong Tang v. Kurt Schmoke
as 21-1243
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER E. HARTLEY, Dean of the College of Public Affairs, DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, Executive Vice President, KURT L. SCHMOKE, President of the University of Baltimore and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONG TANG
Hong Tang v. Kurt Schmoke
as 20-2308
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER E. HARTLEY, Dean of the College of Public Affairs, DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, Executive Vice President, KURT L. SCHMOKE, President of the University of Baltimore and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONG TANG
Hong Tang v. The University of Baltimore
as 20-1810
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, PATRIA DE LANCER JULNES, JOSEPH S. WOOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONG TANG
James Lohnes v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 20-1077
Defendant / Appellee:
S. WOODS, U.S. Postal Service, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and S. FOLSON, U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. LOHNES
Raymond Daniels v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 19-20642
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL, HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BREANNA SCHWARTZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND JOHN DANIELS
Hong Tang v. University of Baltimore
as 19-1146
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, PATRIA DE LANCER JULNES, JOSEPH S. WOOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONG TANG
Scarantino v. Investment Technology Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Investment Technology Group, Inc., R. Jarrett Lilien, Kevin J. Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Wood
as 5:2014mc00165
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark S. Wood
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Wood
as 5:2014cv26946
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark S. Wood
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
