Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Byrd et al v. Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv04009
Plaintiff:
John W Byrd, Forrest S Byrd and Clara A Byrd
Defendant:
Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, Dean Blanchard Seafood, LLC and James R Duck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Byrd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Byrd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WILLIAMS v. ROARK et al
as 2:2021cv00128
Defendant:
J. LUNDY, ROARK, DOROGUCHE and others
Plaintiff:
OLIVER H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball Homes, LLC v. Byrd et al (JRG3)
as 3:2021cv00018
Defendant:
John R Byrd, Gregory S Byrd and Charles E Byrd
Plaintiff:
Ball Homes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00309
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Byrd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
YOUNG v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICE et al
as 2:2020cv00441
Plaintiff:
CARYLON YOUNG
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, WABASH VALLEY NURSING SICK CALL, WABASH VALLEY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. WEXFORD HEALTH et al
as 1:2020cv01695
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH, WOLF, S. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIMS v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2020cv00088
Defendant:
MRS PERPP, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, AMY WRIGTH and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
as 1:2020cv00041
Defendant:
Mrs Perpp, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, Amy Wrigth and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOX v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv00115
Defendant:
K. GILMORE, WEXFORD MEDICAL INC., A. WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. FOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
